00000c27

REPLYTO: 1:396/3 UUCP

REPLYADDR: me@privacy.invalid
From: Diesel 

Virus Guy  news:54CCEF20.370D4968@Guy.corp Sat, 31
Jan 2015 15:05:04 GMT in alt.comp.anti-virus, wrote: 

> Ah, the false promise that NT-based Windoze is oh, so secure
> continues. Even 64-bit versions.

I like being able to use multiple cores and multiple CPUs. It's a real 
shame you can't do that with your chosen antique OS, windows 98.

> I don't know what pile of horse #### is higher:  The fraud and
> criminality that powers Google's advertising business, or the lie
> that the bloated NT-based Windows is or could ever be secured and
> protected from it's own internal complexity and incredibly bad
> coding. 

Windows NT has an advanced file system compared to FAT32; and you can 
set permissions with it. That go well beyond 'read only' as your limited 
to doing. Windows9x has no real concept of security. Programs are free 
to access other memory space outside their own. You cannot easily do 
that under an NT system without pissing something off.



-- 
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory! 
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2