PE>> I updated the available messages on my point setup instead of on
PE>> the BBS.  I checked the netmail and I notice a few of you have sent
PE>> in areafix requests.  However, only one of Rod's has actually got
PE>> processed so far.  So Rod, just send it again and it should work.

RS> As usual, fogged in Edwardsisms. It appeared to work,

RS> Squalid OS/2 V0.36b Echomail Control Utility

RS>     Area PARADOX                        requested from uplink
RS>     Area SUPRAFAX                       requested from uplink

RS> So whats the problem ?

It did work too, started getting mail in atleast one after that.

PE> Probably this one was the one I was talking about:

PE> Ä NETMAIL (3:711/934) ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ NETM
PE> Ä
PE>  Msg  : 1976 of 2026 - 1975                 Snt Pvt

PE>  From : Squalid OS/2 V0.36b                 3:711/934       Wed 26 Oct 94 0

PE>  To   : Rod Speed                           3:711/934.2

PE>  Subj : Echomail Change Requests

PE> ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
PE> Ä
PE> Squalid OS/2 V0.36b Echomail Control Utility

PE> Area FMS                            UNKNOWN

Yeah, likely. Thats still unknown anyway even on the new list. It gets
into Aust but apparently hasnt made it to the backbone yet. No big deal
I imagine it will eventually, its only just stated to come into Aust.

PE> BTW, that routed echomail from Bill got bounced.

PE> Also Brenton, you put a message into locuser, but you sent it
PE> from 3:712/704.7, so my system rejected it.  I manually processed
PE> it. Please refrain from this sort of thing (unless it was Jeff
PE> Green or someone, not you).  Something about poofs in court.

Not a good idea to be doing this stuff to someone who is busy enough to
be skimming the mail.

--- PQWK202