From: "Gary Britt" 

I think you are right and he could be the best chance for the demos.  I
believe this to be true despite his lack of experience for the job of
President.  A single stint in the senate with no prior executive or even
legislative experience in or out of government is not sufficient to qualify
a person for CEO of USA, Inc.  He's a lightweight in that regard.

But despite the above I agree he might have the best chance, principally
because he is younger than the others and better looking.  There are an
inordinately large number of pretty shallow and uniformed women who vote
based upon the looks of the candidate.

This has come out in interviews in Iowa.  More women voted in the Iowa
caucuses than men, and Edwards had a positive gender gap among the gullible
shallow women voters.  Kerry the winner in Iowa had a negative gender gap
among women (he's just not a perty).

These same shallow and gullible women voters were responsible for Clinton
being elected.

Cheers,

Gary "Judy F."  wrote: Edwards may be
a dark horse.
>
> Edwards, IMHO has the best chance of beating Bush  with his typically Democratic ideas that mimic all the rest, he's still
the
> least objectionable of the quickly dispersing bunch because he appears to
> have a brain that can analyze things without coming off as a Dem = Good,
Rep
> = Evil idealogue>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5