"Beauregard T. Nasty" wrote:
 
> Virus Troll crossposted:

You have a problem with the groups I've cross-posted to?

You don't think that the info about the ZeroAccess botnet is applicable
to the 3 groups?

Or are you one of the usenet morons that thinks that crossposting
between usenet groups shouldn't happen, regardless how many thousand
groups exist and the similarity or commonality they may have?

> > or the lie that the bloated NT-based Windows is or could ever be
> > secured and protected from it's [SIC] own internal complexity and
> > incredibly bad coding.
> 
> Isn't this where you are supposed to insert your silly advice
> telling everyone to "upgrade" to Windows 98?  LOL

Ah, laughing klown.

I was supposed to include comments about win-98, so you and others could
feel superior about NT and laugh away the very real history of
vulnerability that NT just can't shake off or rise above, despite
thousands of patches and fixes created over many years.

So no- I didn't include any sort of comment about 98.

So now the ball is in your court to address my ridicule of NT and it's
line of perpetually vulnerable versions of Windoze.  Or fade back into
the woodwork where you came from.
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2