Well, the next shoe has fallen. The defenders of El Presidente are now 
crying foul because Starr is investigating one of the White House 
"compadres" of El Presidente for leaking information to the press. 
They're now saying this person, whose name I can't for the life of me 
remember, was merely excercising his, get this, First Ammendment rights. 
Let me get this right. The White House complains that there are too many 
leaks to the press and blames Starr's office for the leaks. So much so that 
David Kendall files papers in court demanding some sort of resolution. 
Starr responds by saying it's not HIS office. Articles appear in the media 
that the White House, and El Presidente in particular, are the only ones 
who benefit from the leaks. 
Starr investigates and 'lo and behold! It's an aide to El Presidente who 
now faces the Grand Jury. 
If memory serves me right, Kendall, the "Ragin' Cajun" and others were 
demanding Starr's head on a platter since they accused him of the leaks. 
Now that it appears, preliminarily at least, that the leaks did in fact 
come from the White House (why else would Starr be having the aide hauled 
before the Grand Jury?) the HYPOCRITES are invoking the First Ammendment, a 
right I guess Mr. Starr and company don't enjoy. 
Puh - leeze! I'm getting ill about all this hypocritical nonsense. 
And apparently, El Presidente has private investigators snooping into 
Starr and his staff's private lives and backgrounds. 
Yep. This has become as bad as any other bannana republic in this 
hemisphere.
It's getting so deep that even my hip waders can't handle the excrement 
that's eminating from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 
John , jnsampson@ibm.net 
 "To find reasonable doubt, one must first be capable of reason."
___
 * WR 1.33 [NR] * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------