Hello Alan!

10 May 21, Alan Ianson wrote to Kai Richter:

 FB>>>> route hold noroute 2:335/364.1

 KR>> The combination of route hold noroute does not make sense.

 AI> I was thinking that when I setup my first point but the above seems to
 AI> work. Is there a better way to write that out?

I compared my config to the latest docs and was surprised by the change in the route syntax. I'm still on the old syntax with "nopack". The route noroute looks odd but is correct. Sorry for the confusion. Because i'm lazy my line would look like

route hold noroute 2:335/364.*

to catch all points at once. It's the first line in my route.config to make sure to collect own point netmail before the common default routes apply.

Regards

Kai

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7