| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | data overrun? |
BL> I had ***BOTH*** my port and Modem set at 2400. How else do you BL> want me to do it? PE> The other way to do it is to keep the port speed at 19200 or PE> whatever you normally use, and send a string to your modem to PE> force the connect rate to 2400. BL> &N2 does that and I put it in the default init. And then I set BL> the PORT to 2400 too. PE> You asked me how else to do it, and I have answered the PE> question. The "question" was rhetorical. I already sent the the "string" to force 2400. How else can you do it? (WARNING: this is another rhetorical question). It makes no difference to YOU (where the problem lies) where I set my port speed. That's between my modem and my computer. The problem is on the other side of the modem. BL> It's your dopey fucking modem not able to recognise my MNP BL> request! It works okay with the PCUG. PE> One test is not conclusive. If you had tried it 10 times, and PE> all were failures, then I'd say we have a consistent problem PE> with V42 connects at low speeds (where low speed hasn't even PE> been determined yet). Yair... why stop at ten tests? Why not a million?. What if I run the modem for 4 years with no problem... oops! I *HAVE* run the modem or 4 years with no problem. PE> So? When have I suggested otherwise? And BTW, I'm not trying to PE> solve the failure to connect with EC x% of the time, I'm just PE> after the timeouts to be solved at this stage. Have you had *any* EC connects at 2400? Does it not occur to you that the two problems may be connected? Regards, Bob ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 @EOT: ---* Origin: Precision Nonsense, Sydney (3:711/934.12) SEEN-BY: 711/934 712/610 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.