On 10 May 2021 at 01:41p, Deon George pondered and said...
 
 DG>  PH> route crash boss 21:1/190.*
 DG>  PH> (Right Deon?) but I am wondering could/should I also have a noroute f

 DG>  PH> 21:1/190 stated before or after this from completeness? Something lik
 DG>  PH> route crash boss 21:1/190.*
 DG>  PH> route crash noroute 21:1/190
 DG> 
 DG> Right, but you dont need the "noroute" option as well (I dont) - because
 DG> you are "the" hub for 21:1/*.

I tried 

route crash boss 21:1/190.* and HPT did not route netmail for 1/190.1 via
1/190 so that command seems not to work for me.

 DG> If you wanted to route to my point, you wouldnt use route crash boss, but
 DG> rather just "route crash 21:2/100 21:2/*", "route crash 21:3/100
 DG> 21:2/116.*"

Yep that makes sense and is along the lines of what I have in place for you
and the other hubs.

route crash 21:2/100 21:2/*
route crash 21:3/100 21:3/*

etc..

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)