From: Adam Flinton 

Mark Hessey wrote:

> "Monte Davis"  wrote: Pathetic.
>
> You asked for material that backed up my contention, I gave it to you.
>
> "In Greenville, South Carolina, last week, Kerry reiterated his commitment
> to the idea that the threat of international sub-state organizations is not
> primarily a military challenge: "It's primarily an intelligence and law
> enforcement operation that requires cooperation around the world."

& where is the error in the statement?

> So, if you believe that one of the great virtues of George W. Bush's
> presidency since 9/11 has been its clarity and sense of overriding
> purpose--his willingness to call terror-sponsoring, anti-American states
> enemies and to oppose them--then John Kerry is obviously not the man for
> you.

What is unclear about "It's primarily an intelligence and law
enforcement operation that requires cooperation around the world." ?


> If, however, you believe everything that's been accomplished since 9/11
> could have been accomplished through a more legalistic and diplomatic
> approach, in which the good opinion of Western Europe was treated as
> important as the demise of rogue regimes and their friends in the terror
> sector, then John Kerry probably is the man for you."
> http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/688sfrqt.as
p?pg=1
>

Again though where is the problem with that? Are you fighting a war on
terrorists or dictators?



Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5