| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | W2K vs Wx. |
Hello, Charles, it is a great day here.
CA> I appreciate the advice but as I have said, I use DOS off/on
CA> daily and reboot to do that.
Whatever floats your canoe.
CA> When I have the need to operate a server either as an intranet
CA> for 'connection sharing' or 24/7 cable connect WWW/FTP server I
CA> would use W2K in a hearbeat over W9x.
I can see how. W2K is so protected that it would be a good choice.
I have a relative that is a notary and she always worries about
keeping her data secure. She is still on W95 but with what I know
now of W2K, I will try and convince her to make the move. But
again, as Jeff G. said, security is relative still.
BTW, I only have two daughters, you win.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 123/140 500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.