RP>On 02-15-98, JOHN SAMPSON declared to ROBERT PLETT:
JS>RP>teary-eyed over the gondola accident in Italy?  How could we poss
JS>RP>insist on equal standards?
JS>RP>
JS>Silly us. We simply figured that the law applied to everyone equally
JS>silly for me to believe this.
RP>You musta been in hibernation the last several years.  
No, just idealistic is all. Still, after all these years. 
JS>This moron lacks the moral authority to order American men and women
JS>harms way. Wonder what would happen if the Joint Chiefs refused to c
JS>out his orders? What if the entire military did that?
RP>Hoo boy!  Talk about Constitutional crisis!  Sheesh!
Talk about mutiny. That's what the charge would be. However, it might prove 
to be interesting to see who would sit on the judge's panel.
JS>I can tell you one thing for certain. If he involves us in a major m
JS>conflict in Iraq and we start seeing America's best and brightest co
JS>home in body bags, the polls will show very different numbers. His a
JS>ratings will plummet.
RP>Support for an attack on Iraq is already fading, and so are Clinton's
RP>poll numbers.
Yep. 'Bout time too. Maybe people are begining to wake up. Notice that the 
attack dogs have been reigned in since Starr has said he's ticked off at 
deliberate White House attempts to undermine his investigation? Said he'd 
investigate those who were responsible. Like the "Ragin' Cajun".  'Ole 
snake head hasn't said much lately has he?
In fact, isn't it interesting that other than the bag of hot air, Ginsburg, 
no one's been attacking Starr lately?
John , jnsampson@ibm.net 
 "To find reasonable doubt, one must first be capable of reason."
___
 * WR 1.33 [NR] * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------