From: "Rich Gauszka" 

It's about finite resources and knowing your capabilities to accomplish
goals.  It's about more than just Iraq though. It's about the substitution
of  cluster bombs for diplomacy. It's about not having the resources
necessary to foster any kind of success in Afghanistan ( unless you are an
opium lord ). It's about inadequate information when you rush to action.
It's about a myriad other blunders that will relegate this administration
into the buffoons hall of fame.


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:4518a1f9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote: ... That's
what happens when
> an
> administration chooses the battlefield rather than long term diplomacy to
> meet it's goals...
>
> Oh c'mon Rich, is this the "we should have left Saddam in
power" argument?
>
> I reject that wholesale.  argument about it>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5