From: "Mark" 

Eh, unsurprisingly, I disagree with your assessment Rich.  


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
news:4518a5e9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> It's about finite resources and knowing your capabilities to accomplish
> goals.  It's about more than just Iraq though. It's about the substitution
> of  cluster bombs for diplomacy. It's about not having the resources
> necessary to foster any kind of success in Afghanistan ( unless you are an
> opium lord ). It's about inadequate information when you rush to action.
> It's about a myriad other blunders that will relegate this administration
> into the buffoons hall of fame.
>
>
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:4518a1f9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote: ...
That's what happens when
>> an
>> administration chooses the battlefield rather than long term diplomacy to
>> meet it's goals...
>>
>> Oh c'mon Rich, is this the "we should have left Saddam in power"
>> argument?
>>
>> I reject that wholesale. > argument about it>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5