From: "Phil Payne" 

> At some point assuming they aren't "shot trying to escape" these bods
> will go free & at that point if they can show torture etc then foreign
> travel is going to be a casualty for many in the US admin.

> They were warned over Bagram, they were warned over GT, they were warned
> over Abu Ghraib, they were warned over secret prisons.

> That they chose to ignore such warnings is their choice just as it was
> the choice of Milosovic, Karadic & Mladic.

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/conor_foley/2006/09/the_long_arm_of_the_law
.html

"The attorney general was right to warn the US government that it
risks international condemnation in its attempts to free its interrogators
from the "constraints" of these conventions. He should go further
and tell its members that they could also be risking arrest if they visit
Britain in the future."

Yup - and it's not within the power of any UK body to prevent that - if
(e.g.) Holland issues an international arrest warrant, the UK is obliged to
arrest and extradite.

I think Shrub is really looking for retrospective "Get out of Jail
free" cards for the CIA because they already HAVE broken international
law.  And I don't think he's going to get them.  It's staggering to watch
the USA going the same way as Chile without a peep from its population.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5