BL> Borland solved it with the one-line comment "//" but this isn't
BL> ANSI

PE> That's C++, not Borland. It's part of the C++ standard.

BL> Perhaps you could explain the error in my original statement. Is it
BL> ANSI, or not? And did Borland solve it with "//" or not?

1. It is part of ANSI C++, not ANSI C.

2. There was nothing to solve.

3. Borland didn't solve anything, they used ANSI C++ comments like lots of
other people.

BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---