| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Scientists against Bush - Does anyone like the man? |
From: "Mark Hessey" "John Cuccia" wrote: It's not a "peer" review when the Administration selects the > reviewers. The peer review process: - establishes uniform government-wide standards for the peer review, - focuses on the role of public participation in peer review activities, the content of peer review reports, and the agency's responsibilities to respond to the comments of peer reviewers, - and requires disclosure of a peer review panel. "Existing agency peer review mechanisms have not always been sufficient to ensure the reliability of regulatory information disseminated or relied upon by federal agencies. ... Even when agencies do conduct timely peer reviews, such reviews are sometimes undertaken by people who are not independent of the agencies, or are not perceived to be independent. Simply put, the agency proposing or supporting a regulation or study may not always be the best entity to commission or supervise its own peer review. Nonetheless, some agencies sometimes use their own employees to do peer reviews - a practice forbidden by other agencies' peer review manuals." http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/pubpress/2003-34.pdf --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.