1237aafcea9c
tech



Hello Robert - 

CA>> I'm not saying anything about eproms or eeproms I'm just
CA>> saying that if the virus 'thing' was _ever_ taken
CA>> seriously the ISPs could scan for them. The fact that they
CA>> don't leads me to believe it's just a scam. 

RS> Couldn't that make them "in control of content" opening
RS> them up to all sorts of legal problems? 

Yes, control being the keyword here. It is a pandora's box. 

RS> Isn't that "censorship"? Not to mention the slowdown of
RS> traffic due to the scans? 

With modern equipment I doubt there would be much of a slowdown
but censorship would be easy enough to slip in without anyone
noticing it, yes. 

RS> Seems they're damned if they do, and damned if they don't. 

If I was hired to solve the problem I guarantee you it would be
solved. :-) 

>
>        ,                          ,
>      o/      Charles.Angelich      \o       ,
>       __o/
>     / >          USA, MI           < \   __\__
 

___ * ATP/16bit 2.31 * 
... DOS the Ghost in the Machine! http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/

--- Maximus/2 3.01