Path:
number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!nntp.infostrada.it!area.cu.mi.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!seltaeb.ghgcorp.com!rmb-mod
From: rollee 
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles.moderated,rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: LOVE Album Song Dissection
Followup-To: rec.music.beatles.moderated
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:07:41 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Adtech Computers, Inc.
Lines: 15
Approved: rmbm-request{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Message-ID: 
References: 

NNTP-Posting-Host: seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: tdi.cu.mi.it 1171746461 10912 69.44.227.18 (17 Feb 2007 21:07:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse{at}diesel.cu.mi.it
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:07:41 +0000 (UTC)
Originator: rmb-mod{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.music.beatles.moderated:17103
rec.music.beatles:1044478

I haven't heard any of the "Love" album, and don't plan to. Let's
face it, the
last RELEASED official Beatles album of 'new' material was Let It Be.  Anthology
was an official Beatles release, but it was a collection of outtakes from the
recording sessions, and as such, can't really be considered to be new material.
>From what I have read, the "Love" album has taken Beatles
songs and mutilated
them by mixing songs together.  I guess some would consider this to be an art
form, and I guess it is, but really, to take classic Beatles songs, and then
mutilate them in the name of art is what I would consider to be blasphemy.  The
Beatles should have never authorized such an endeavour.

--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.    
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
---
 þ Derby City GateWorks:  UUCP  FidoNet