-=> Quoting Laurie Batt to David Drummond <=-

 MP>> That's right.  Forgery.  Because there is no way known that
 MP>> I would have written that, and then proceeded to leave the
 MP>> contact details of the designer on the file.  DO you really
 MP>> think I'm that dumb?

 LB> He is.

Would you like to prove that, arsehole?

 DD> I feed Bill his mail and the message in my message base also claims "my
 DD> own design".

 LB> A check on the path and seen-by lines reveals that this message was
 LB> not a forgery.  These lines were identical in all ways to messages
 LB> originating from him, perhaps they are forgeries also. While is is
 LB> possible for this to occur it would be extremely unlikely that it
 LB> happened. To forge a message and make all the see-by and path lines
 LB> identical would be difficult to achieve.

Not really.  Just get a copy of another message from my system to his, and
pull off all the appropriate lines.  No problems.

I do not deny writing the message.  I deny having written "It is my own
design".

 LB> And all this from someone who recently nominated to want to become the
 LB> ZC, I can only imagine how he would have performed those duties if he
 LB> had have been elected.

A hell of a lot better than you would, I can assure you.



________________________________________________________________________
See ya,         |  Matthew Palmer, 3:712/844{at}Fidonet
        Maddy   |
        ^^^     |  maddy{at}intercoast.com.au
 
--- FMail/386 1.0g