-=> Quoting Chris Hoppman to All <=-

 CH> Since ya'll are asking for someone to help.  Maybe you can help me
 CH> with a  problem I am having with a source code I am modifing.

 CH> It has timeslices built into it, but the CPU usage is still in the
 CH> upper  limits (89-98%).  I sorta remember something I have read and
 CH> wantted to verify it.  That the timeslices shouldn't be gave at
 CH> anytime. Like say you do this. 
 CH> For A := 0 to 100 do
 CH> begin
 CH> {Do some stuff here}
 CH> TimeSlice;
 CH> end;

 CH> It would do 100 timeslices back to back.

 CH> I have read that you should time them to be at least 55 ms apart 
 CH> ( depending on the system ).  That if you do like I did above it will
 CH> accually make the application use more of the CPU. 

 CH> Maybe someone could explain to me all about Time Slices.  Or point me
 CH> in the  direction of a place I can read up on them.

     I actually never sat down to use timeslices except for a few
     Java programs.  The only close to that would be simple
     program/execution delays.  With that said my experience with
     such is just not as high say as some.

     The problem is that with today's modern compilers and computers
     getting faster and faster every day timeslices get less
     and less value.  A timeslice for a old 286 is just nothing
     for a 5 gigmhz machine.  So you have to adapt your timeslices
     for the actual cpu speed.  So if you really really want
     to get involved you should get code to detect the cpu speed
     and then modify the timeslice accordingly.

     Another thing is why do you need the timeslice?  A multi-tasking
     software? A TSR? A game?  The particular type of software
     also indicates how to go.  A game sometimes need fast and
     sometimes slow timeslices, for example.

     Now with that stuff said have you checked out SWAG?  It has
     at least 3 sample codes using the keyword time slice in it.
     One for os/2 and Desqview and 2 others general code sources.
     Keep in mind though those are in pure assembler.  But ASM
     is a good way to go with timeslices.

... Now, what was that magic word? Shazzam?  Nah - Garibaldi
--- Fringe BBS