[ Quoting Greg Cobb to Scott Little ] 
 -> Above is a perfect example of just why I don't use OS/2 for my day-to-day
 -> use. If I have to go through nine possible backup programs to find one 
that
 -> WORKs, let alone one that I like, it's a pretty sad picture.
 GC> All programs are NOT the same.  Make sense yet?
Urm, backup programs, at least any decent one, should support several types
of backup drives. NovaBack and Arcada support many types. Most of the ones
I tried for OS2 didn't support all that many.
 
 GC> When 95 first came out what were your alternatives for TBU software?
I didn't have a tape drive at that time. What's your point? Are you going to
try make an arguement out of not having software for a new OS?
 
 -> Since when are TABLEs 'new fangled'?  You seem to think 3.2 is leaps and
 -> bounds ahead of everyone. It's not. WebExplorer and NetScape/2 support 
he
 -> majority of HTML3 (and quite a lot of 3.2) tags. It's just that OS2 
doesn't
 -> have anything that can edit the damn things.
 GC> You're speaking before you think again.
Me?! Since you know so much about hypertext, you probably have an internet
account. Go have a little surf over to www.w3c.com and have a read.
Regards,
 - Scott
[ admin@cyberia.asstdc.com.au | www.asstdc.com.au/~cyberia ]
--- FMailX 1.22
3:712/848)
---------------