| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Dawkins on Kimura |
Larry Moran wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:57:28 +0000 (UTC), Anon. > wrote: > >>dkomo wrote: >> >>>Tim Tyler wrote: >> > > [snip] > > >>>>Drift may have something to say about small populations on islands >>>>around speciation events - but it's probably a bit player in most >>>>other places - as far as the *features* of organisms go (as opposed >>>>to the makeup of their genes). >>> >>>Really? You mean the fact that people have brown, green, or blue >>>eyes, are short or tall, fat or skinny, beautiful or ugly, have red, >>>black or blonde hair, are prone to get different diseases in old age, >>>have different reactions to medications, have different physical >>>abilities like being able to run for long distances, sing very well, >>>be really strong, and so on and so on -- these are all the result of >>>adaptations and natural selection? >>> >> >>Why not? Their ancestors have experienced different environments, so >>hte selective pressures will be different. Add into the mix variation >>in the environment (which can help maintain polymorphism), and >>disruptive selection, we have plenty of adaptive explanations for the >>diversity we see. >> >>Of course, drift may also be an explanation, but I believe that we can >>only separate out the contributions of the different causes empirically. > > > Yes. Until we can actually test the hypotheses it's wise not to *assume* > that all morphological features are adaptations, don't you think? > As long as we can't exclude non-adaptive explanations, then we can't dismiss them. But there may be occasions when making that assumption does lead to further enlightenment. It seems to be a problem of scientific rhetoric. Hmm. I'm not sure whether I answered you or not. > Tim seems to be making the default assumption that most morphological > features are due to natural selection. Dawkins certainly makes that > assumption. Is this valid? > Well, it's valid. Is it correct? My feeling is that it is, but if someone show me evidence that it isn't, then I'll change my mind. Bob -- Bob O'Hara Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 5) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland Telephone: +358-9-191 23743 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 22 779 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: http://www.jnr-eeb.org --- þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com --- * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 2/26/04 3:00:01 PM* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.