In article , csmkersh@flash.net (Sam A.
Kersh) wrote:

> mcculloch@mail.utexas.edu (Jim McCulloch) wrote:
 
> ....  a long winded disclaimer which doesn't math his past positions...


I see you have removed not only my supposed "disclaimer", but your own
accusation, which was, if you will allow me to refresh your memory, that I
advocate confiscation of guns.

I do not advocate confiscation of guns. Never have.

In a different thread, I mentioned that you have an honesty problem,
because you presented a very selective quote which totally misrepresented
the article it came from.

But that was an ungenerous remark on my part. I take it back. I see now
that your problem is not that you are dishonest, but that you can't think
very clearly.  

Try to focus on this, Sam.

Jim:  I have never advocated confiscation of guns.
Sam: Yes you have.
Jim:  Where do you get this stuff, Sam?
Sam: You called Mr. Hale a murderer, therefore you advocate confiscation
of      
     firearms.

Get some help here, Sam. If you are diligent, and with the assistance of
someone who is not logic-impaired, you'll see what's wrong with your
conclusion.

Best regards,

--Jim McCulloch