From: Adam Flinton 

Dave Ings wrote:

> Actually I've always found it a rather odd concept that nation-states assert
> the right to restrict the movement of humanity around the globe.
>
> As a member of the fortunate class (materially speaking) inhabiting this
> globe, it may be to my personal benefit that this right is asserted. But I
> still have trouble seeing how it's defensible in abstract terms.

Abstract & real guns. Lots of em. Don't have enough (e.g. North
American Indians or Australian Aborigines) & then it is undefensible in
any terms.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5