>>> Part 12 of 15...
of Democracy Won the Cold War,'' the copy read. ``Can it
Win the Drug War?'' To find out, readers were invited to
attend a three-day conference featuring officials from the
Pentagon, Congress and government agencies who would detail
``Industry Opportunities'' arising from the $10.6 billion
anti-drug budget. ``Can you afford to miss it?''
Franklin's add asked.
About 200 representatives of aerospace and computer
companies decided they could not -- not even at the cost of
$950 a person.
[11] MASSACHUSETTS LAW REVIEW, Spring 1990 pp 38-42, ``Search and
Seizure -- Drug Testing'' by David A. Grossbaum
[12] (*) ADDICTION 88, pp 163-166 1993; ``Hair analysis for
drugs: technological breakthrough or ethical quagmire?'' by John
Strang, Joseph Black, Andrew Marsh, & Brian Smith
...
While it may be politically attractive to concentrate on
illicit drugs, it ignores the reality that it is the use of
alcohol and nicotine and not illicit drugs which constitutes
the greatest threat to safety and productivity in the work
place. The resources used in drug screening programmes
might usefully be redirected towards education and
rehabilitation based initiatives which address all the
issues surrounding the use of drugs and alcohol in the work-
force. Directing resources towards the new and expensive
technology of hair analysis is a retrograde step.
[13] (*) THE MILBANK QUARTERLY, Vol 69, No 3, 1991 pp 437-459
``Social Behavior, Public Policy, and Non-harmful Drug Use'' by
Charles Winick
...
One conclusion of the literature on mood-modifying drugs
like heroin and cocaine is that their regular nonmedical use
will almost inevitably lead to bleak personal and social
outcomes. My article suggests that the conventional picture
of uniformly negative consequences of regular drug use is
not supported by the data.
...
... in a statewide study of all the narcotics addicts who
could be located in Kentucky ... more than nine-tenths of
the males receiving drugs legally were working effectively
at established occupations. An improvement in work pattern
typically followed an addict's securing a stable drug
source, suggesting that this facilitated or caused improved
work situation.
...
... One ophthalmic surgeon noted: ``With Demerol, I can do
three or four perfect operations a day. It builds up my
resistance and makes it easier for me to concentrate when I
am working double shifts and just couldn't keep up with it.
The drug help a lot.'' A trumpeter said: ``With the heroin,
I could feel and look cool and reach and hold the sound I
wanted.'' A warehouse worker stated: ``It's a very slow and
long day, taking plumbing parts out of bins. Without the
drugs, I couldn't make it.'' A television cameraman
observed: ``I can't make a mistake on the job. I work a lot
of overtime and the drugs make it easier for me to
concentrate.'' No doubt other factors in the lives of these
study subjects contributed to the relatively prosaic
character of their drug habit and enhanced their ability to
work: licit occupations, structured schedules, and
participation in conventional family and community
activities.
...
William S. Halstead, the father of modern surgery and a
founder of Johns Hopkins Medical School, was cocaine
dependent until the age of 34, when he turned to morphine,
on which he probably remained continually dependent until
his death at age 70. He was professionally active and
medically creative during his whole life.
There are no reports demonstrating that addicted physicians
are more likely to commit malpractice than others. Indeed,
the country's largest program for addicted medical
professionals reports that a physician's professional
activities represent the last aspect of his or her life to
be affected by drug dependence. Drug-using physicians
typically have successful and active primary care practices
... some addicted physicians were described as ``the best
doctor in town''
...
>>> Continued to next message...
___
X Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 X
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------
* Origin: Who's Askin'? (1:17/75)
|