Hi Janet,
Janet Sullivan wrote in a message to All:
 JS> Beta -25 has, in effect, lobotomized my external SupraFaxModem 288.
 JS> Ahem, well, after further investigation into why this may have
 JS> happened, I came to the conclusion that it might have been my
 JS> fault.  Out of tiredness and sheer stupidity I may have uploaded
 JS> the .zip file instead of the .sb7 file.  I'm honestly not sure if I
 JS> did or not, but I thought I'd best mention that the problem may
 JS> have been caused by my stupidity and not by supra.  If that's the
 JS> case, I apologize to supra for the tone of my previous message.  If
 JS> not, well... ;)
I read over the file announcement for the beta's, it looked to me that the 
-25 beta flash was for the *internal* SupraFaxModem 288 modems.  Could that 
have been the problem?
BTW, I had a modem lock up on me during flashing a beta once before.  I had 
to return it to Supra to be fixed. :-(
Regards,
                  > 
--- GEcho/32 1.20/Pro
---------------