Hello Robert.

30 Jan 06 22:12, you wrote to me:


 RT>> My impression of BBBS, was that it was build for some other form of
 RT>> networking, and FidoNet Technology networking was tacked on as an
 RT>> after thought, which makes it a difficult package to use, and
 RT>> relate too. It otherwise not a bad BBS system, but not for me ...
 RT>> :-)

 RW> I totally agree with you on this.  I mean, configuration issues and
 RW> difficulties aside, it's still not that bad of a program all in all.

Nope, not a bad program, just on that does not fit in the FidoNet context very 
well ...

 RT>> BBBS support is also a little thin, seldom see or hear from Kim
 RT>> Hieno .

 RW> This I would have to agree with you on.

:-((

 RT>> MBSE BBS is TOPS! ... 

 RW> This I would have to agree with you on as well :)

Heeee ... heeee ....

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5