| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | News: 09-28 |
Wayne Chirnside wrote in a message to Roy J. Tellason: WC> This is EXACTLY what I feared and in fact predicted from the very WC> first :-( RJT> Oh, I've got some more info to post on that. I just need to get it RJT> over to this machine... Actually it was over on this machine, in a mailing list. Subj. line was Oh, great... WC> More is coming out about the abuses of this all the time :-( WC> Actually the abuse was passing it in the first place. No difference of opinion there. I'd suspected that our politicians were thinking that way for a long time, this just shows it more blatantly. WC> Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the WC> Judiciary Committee, said members of Congress expected some of the WC> new powers granted to law enforcement to be used for nonterrorism WC> investigations. But he said the Justice Department's secrecy and WC> lack of cooperation in putting the legislation into effect made him WC> question whether "the government is taking shortcuts around the WC> criminal laws" by invoking intelligence powers -- with differing WC> standards of evidence — to conduct surveillance operations and WC> demand access to records. RJT> No, really?! Duh...! WC> Guilty until proven innocent, if they let you attempt to do so :-( RJT> If you ever freakin' make it to court, instead of just "getting RJT> disappeared"... WC> That's what if they let you above refers to. Even I, as doubtful as I was of some of the ravings coming out of the more extreme corners of the 'net, when talking about such things as the camps and whatnot didn't think they'd go quite as far as they seem to have with this. And it's all "legal", too... WC> "We did not intend for the government to shed the traditional WC> tools of criminal investigation, such as grand jury subpoenas WC> governed by well-established precedent and wiretaps strictly WC> monitored" by federal judges, he said. RJT> If they expected something other than what they got, they really RJT> oughta get their heads outta their butts... WC> Justice Department officials say such criticism has not deterred WC> them. RJT> "Sticks and stones..." WC> They need to rename that Department to reflect it's new goals... WC> Injustice Department? RJT> I _really_ need to get myself another copy of 1984. And maybe Brave RJT> New World, WC> Read the first but not the latter. A very different approach to a dystopia, but well worth the read, I think. RJT> while I'm at it. I've read both, don't know what happened to the RJT> copies I used to have. But I think it's time for a refresher course, RJT> so to speak... WC> "There are many provisions in the Patriot Act that can be used in WC> the general criminal law," Mark Corallo, a department spokesman, WC> said. "And I think any reasonable person would agree that we have WC> an obligation to do everything we can to protect the lives and WC> liberties of Americans from attack, whether it's from terrorists WC> or garden-variety criminals." RJT> Lives _and_ liberties?! Right. RJT> They're gonna do what they want to do, and any excuse that's handy RJT> _will_ be used... WC> And the sheeple will cheerfully support it because it's called WC> "The Patriot Act." RJT> Until their ox is gored, yeah. WC> But by then they will no longer be heard of and only they will WC> know of the injustice having been silenced :-( Unless there's enough of them, which remains to be seen. WC> The incredible lack of critical thinking in this country today is WC> depressing to me. RJT> I saw a post elsewhere that suggested that at least how people _feel_ RJT> about this stuff and how they're reacting to things may be changing... WC> If you recall I've already said when Bush - Ashcroft first came to WC> power and started violating the Constitution left and right I had WC> _some_ hope for a backlash effect from their transgressions. WC> I certainly hope this hope is forfilled I have my doubts about whether joe average is going to bestir himself unless pushed too far, and those guys are real good at not pushing too hard, for the most part, that's a lot of how they get away with what they do. The process that's going on has been going on for _generations_ now, and slowing it down, stopping it, or reversing it is not going to be something trivial or easy... I'm open to suggestions! ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.