| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Human Conception Rati |
dkomo wrote: > John Wilkins wrote: >> >> William L Hunt wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:00:33 +0000 (UTC), dkomo >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> William L Hunt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:57:56 +0000 (UTC), dkomo >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Tim Tyler wrote: >>>>>> dkomo wrote or quoted: >>>>> >>>>>>> Web pages of unknown origin are not necessarily good resources. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This was a set of lecture notes from a course at University >>>>>> College >>>>>> London: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The course was "C339 Sex, Genes and Evolution 2004": >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucbhkof/stalkie/c339 >>>>>> >>>>> I'll just point out that Tim is being a little harsh because the >>>>> website makes clear they "assume" equal investment cost for male >>>>> and >>>>> female offspring. From that "assumption" they derive/use a primary >>>>> sex >>>>> ratio of 1:1. >>>> >>>> Please be advised that I don't by any means consider the argument >>>> about what Fisher actually said to be concluded. I think both you >>>> and >>>> Tim Tyler are wrong. Fisher never used terminology like "equal >>>> investment cost." His original theory of the sex ratio is as I >>>> stated >>>> in my previous post where I quoted from the lecture notes. >>>> >>>> I've carried this as far as I can for the moment because I don't >>>> have >>>> time to run off to the local university library and reference >>>> Fisher's >>>> _Genetical Theory of Natural Selection_, where he presented his sex >>>> ratio theory. I'm instead relying on secondary sources which I have >>>> on hand which are interpretations of Fisher's theory. >>>> >>>> You can simply provide the relevant quote from Fisher's book to >>>> prove >>>> me wrong, and I'll accept that -- but only that. >>>> >>> I'll quote from the website you provided (lecture notes): >>> >>> "Fisher: optimal sex ratio reflects the cost >>> of producing each sex. >>> If males are twice as costly to produce as >>> females, then males are only worth >>> producing if they have twice the >>> reproductive success of females. This will >>> occur when there are twice as many >>> females as males in the population. That >>> is, the optimal sex ratio is 1:2. >>> In order to determine the optimal sex ratio, >>> the number of individuals of each sex must >>> be weighted by the cost of producing this >>> sex." >>> >>> Why would you think this is not also from Fisher when they are >>> saying >>> it is? Or why would you accept what they say is from Fisher in one >>> section but not what they say is from Fisher in another? >>> I would also have to reference Fisher's book to be sure what he >>> "exactly" said. >>> William L Hunt >>> >>> ... >>> [snip] >>> ... >>>> --dkomo{at}cris.com >>>> >> >> Page 158ff in the 1958 edition (but no apparent resetting from the >> 1930 >> edition); excuse typos: >> >> God, there was a man who knew how to use a comma... >> -- > > And semicolons. And long paragraphs. > > I ran across a number of comments on the web about _Genetical Theory > of Natural Selection_. Many biologists consider Fisher's book to be > second in importance only to _Origin of Species_ for the theory of > evolution. Fisher, however, ranks far down the list from Darwin for > prose style, IMHO. > It was noted in the obits for William Hamilton that he had hoped at the end of his life to get a first in Fisher's GToNS. The book is deep - really deep, despite the eugenics of the latter half. The reason why I typed all that out by hand was to read it in detail (a process that works well for me, as I'm a lousy typist and have to proofread carefully). It was worth it. I now have about six independent lines of thought from those two paragraphs... -- John Wilkins john_SPAM{at}wilkins.id.au http://wilkins.id.au "Men mark it when they hit, but do not mark it when they miss" - Francis Bacon -- John S Wilkins Head, Communication Services The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Parkville, Victoria, Australia --- þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com --- * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 2/24/04 6:36:16 AM* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.