From: "Gary Britt" 

If you can't understand it without special training Bob then its vague.
That's the point.  Even with special training it would still be vague.  I
disagree with your entire premise.  Give 3 people special training from 3
different sources in 3 different countries and you'll get 9 different
interpretations of what is meant by "affronts to personal
dignity".

Gary

"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:45254ebf{at}w3.nls.net...
>> OK so list for me what's allowed and what isn't when questioning a Muslim
>> terrorist suspect?
>
> It's not my job to do and I don't have sufficient training (I was computer
> science major, not sociology), though I do know a few even though I
> haven't studied Muslim's enough, like making them see naked people, and
> making them go unclothed themselves, making them watch when others are
> having sex, burning or disparaging the Koran in front of them.....
>
> And on that same note, our Army has got to have some idiots in charge --
> having dark sunglasses on when talking to an Arab is pretty much admitting
> you have something to hide, direct eye contact is extremely *important*,
> they will not trust anyone who wont make direct eye contact whatsoever.
> (This one has bothered me for a LONG time and yet I see our troops not
> even making an effort to reach the Iraqi people.)
>
> --
> Bob Comer
>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5