From: "Gary Britt" 

OK so list for me what's allowed and what isn't when questioning a Muslim
terrorist suspect?  If its so easy and clear should be no problem for you
to do.

Gary

"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:45251522{at}w3.nls.net...
>> If you think "affronts to personal dignity" isn't vague
then please list
>> for me those things that are and aren't violations of that standard.
>
> It isn't vague at all if one has sociology training and a very little bit
> of time to study the group you're targeting.
>
> --
> Bob Comer
>
>
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:45248ef1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Its vague because its vague.  It is so vague that if the same language
>> were made part of some USA criminal statute the ACLU, et al would
>> immediately oppose it being imposed on any run of the mill
>> killer/murderer as being unconstitutionally vague in that it is so vague
>> a person could not determine what is prohibited and what isn't prohibited
>> with any rational degree of certainty.
>>
>> If you think "affronts to personal dignity" isn't vague
then please list
>> for me those things that are and aren't violations of that standard.
>>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
>> news:4524709a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> No one else has found it "vague" so far.
>>>
>>> It's only vague because it doesn't say what they want it to say.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Comer
>>>
>>>
>>> "Phil Payne"
 wrote in message
>>> news:4524467d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>>>> news:452402ff$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> Because the language being dealt with is so vague ..
>>>>
>>>> No one else has found it "vague" so far.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5