| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: US Supremes: Sanctity or Sanctimonious |
From: "Gregg N"
"John Beamish" wrote in message
news:408e891b{at}w3.nls.net...
> I know there are those who genuinely believe the US Supremes are unsullied
> by politics. They believe that there is a certain sanctity or
> inviolability, that the Supremes stand above the fray and merely judge it.
>
> They may want sanctity, they're getting sanctimony:
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4844313/
>
> "If it is reasonable to think that a Supreme Court justice can be bought
so
> cheap, the nation is in deeper trouble than I had imagined," Scalia wrote
in
> rejecting the Sierra Club's request that he disqualify himself.
What about what he said is sanctimonious?
Gregg
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.