Hey Roy!

Sep 19 06:29 05, Roy J. Tellason wrote to Maurice Kinal:

 RJT> Got three more boxes sitting not too far from where I'm sitting at 
 RJT> the moment,  if I find a use for them...

Right now I only have the pc/104 one.  I was going to get another going but
there is too much wrong with it.  It would have been nice though.

 MK>> Certainly more useful then a POTs connection.

 RJT> There are a bunch of factors that come into play that rule that 
 RJT> option out for me...

Understood.

 RJT> I'd just need to sort the cards I have out into which ones will 
 RJT> handle 100 (there are only a couple of them),  and get another hub 
 RJT> -- the current one has 16 ports,  but the newer ones don't seem to 
 RJT> go that high for some reason.

Shouldn't need even 16.  I couldn't fit 16 in here.  At any given moment I
usually have two going, one as the firewall/router, and the other as my
workstation.  Currently I am playing with the idea of audio/visual
streaming on the wireless connection so I put a small box with three
network interfaces (all Intel Pro's) and a VIA C3 800MHz processor as the
firewall/router.  Basically all it needs now is for me to get off my * and
get streaming working from there.  My workstation can handle everything
else, compiling mostly but it has the major multimedia hardware with
digital processing utilities/libs on there to stream to the router.  It is
already vastly superior to the internet.  :-)

Life is good,
Maurice

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2