From: "Gary Britt" 

You are correct short of nuclear our standing army isn't large enough.  I
never said what weapons and tactics I would employ.  As for the rest.  If
by the rest of the world wouldn't let us, you mean France and Germany and
New Zealand, oh and let's not forget Beamish's Canadian armies, its really
hard to stop laughing while trying to type this response.

Cheers,

Gary

"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:zBFlAtgaXSeP092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Gary Britt"

wrote:
> >If Gary were in charge the war would be over, Iraq would be devoid of
> >violence, and Iran and Syria would be trying very hard to be our friends
> >right away.  In fact being our friend would be so important to them that
you
> >would think it was a life or death issue for them.
>
> Short of nuclear, you (the USA) simply don't have the ability (remotely
> deployable military strength) to do that. Nor would you be allowed to try,
> both by your own people and the rest of the world.
>
> --
> Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5