Re: Re: php software
  By: Scott Adams to Nick Andre on Sat Dec 24 2005 12:05 am

 >  -=> Quoting Nick Andre to Jeff Herrings <=-
 > 
 >  >>         I know some of those do telnet (TG for example)...
 >  > RS>
 >  > RS> I guess that depends on what your definition of "do" is.
 > 
 >  > Well.. lets see.  I'm replying from a Renegade BBS, being accessed via
 >  > TCP
 >  > port 23, I would say that RG does indeed -DO- telnet.
 >  NA>
 >  NA> I'm actually siding with Rob on this topic - Renegade doesn't
"do"
 >  NA> Telnet, it merely reacts to whatever the underlining FOSSIL driver
 >  NA> tells it to do.
 > 
 >      Yep.  I never said "do" means native support.

If it doesn't "do" it without assistance from 3rd party software,
it doesn't
"do" it. The 3rd party software is "doing" it.

 >      I said do because it supports and allows it.

How could it not allow it? It doesn't even know anything about it.

 >      Which it does. Semantics maybe
 >      but if hes going to post stupid false stuff then he can think
 >      what he wants.

The only "stupid false stuff" seems to be coming from your posts.

                                                  digital man

Snapple "Real Fact" #74:
You share your birthday with 9 million others in the world.
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32