> other BBS programs that he did.  He's all pissy because someone prefers TG
 > even now, even though Synchronet (and others) have integrated functions, suc
 > as telnet.  Synchronet doesn't "do" telnet either, the
Winsock does.  Now, h
 > yas like that shit? LOL.
RS> 
RS> WinSock does TCP/IP and knows nothing of the Telnet protocol. Neither does 
RS> or RG for that matter. Synchronet does. Just a fact. The only one that appe
RS> "pissy" here is you. Get your facts straight and come back
when you have a
RS> clue.

Using your logic, I'd be correct.  

Get my facts straight? >:)  Rob, I assure you my friend, my facts are 
straight.

I'm not getting pissy, you and your arrogant self decided to start slamming 
other softwares, pissed because people STILL use them despite all the work 
you've done on Synchronet.  You just havent the nads to admit it.

That being said, I'll gladly contribute in this conversation one on one, so 
that you can at that time test me to see if I have a "clue."

--- Renegade v10-24.5/Alpha