| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Dynalink 33.6 init |
>> To be more accurate, USR modems utilise the officially ITU-ratified Class >> 2.0 fax code, whilst most others use Rockwell's non-standard Class 2. HM> You just know I can't resist this, don't you? :-) HM> USR are about the only manufacturer to actually implement Class 2.0. HM> Class 2.0 HM> is only a standard in the minds of some beauracrats at the ITU-TSS, while HM> class HM> 2 is the standard (official or defacto is irrelevant) which most of the HM> world HM> is using. BUT WHO took it upon themselves to push class1 and class2 to "make them the standard" Some commercially minded idiot that was looking at his own profit line... or another one of your beauracrats working for the opposition It certainly was not the people that use the product (end users) They have absolutely NO SAY. Nor was it a group of experts that looked at the pro's & con's of each class. Some other commercially minded person with enough clout could just as well pick up the class 2.0 ball tomorrow and run with it Russell --- Terminate 4.00/Pro* Origin: Electron Migration (3:640/305.55) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/99 620/243 623/630 681 640/201 206 230 305 306 311 702 820 SEEN-BY: 640/821 822 823 829 711/401 410 413 430 808 809 899 932 934 712/311 SEEN-BY: 712/407 505 506 517 623 624 628 704 841 888 713/317 714/906 772/20 SEEN-BY: 800/1 @PATH: 640/305 820 712/624 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.