From: "Mark" 

I feel a bit foolish in bothering to reply at all, I based my reply on
Rich's excerpts and never actually followed the link, had I seen where it
led, I'd have just passed as it's obviously foolishness.

Anyway, I just ran across this entry at Belmont Club that led to my
discovery of the source:
http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-true-honest.html

The first two words say all that needs to be said: "Robert Fisk
suggests that Israel used "a secret new uranium-based weapon in
southern Lebanon this summer in the 34-day assault that cost more than
1,300 Lebanese lives, most of them civilians". (Hat tip Tim Blair)

Wow. Just imagine how many secret atomic bombs it would have taken to kill
655,000 Iraqis as proved by Lancet since it took 34 days of nonstop bombing
to kill 1,300 Lebanese with Jewish nuclear weapons. This is the amazing
thing about news stories which by constant repetition have become fact.
America and the Jews have all these horrifying weapons, yet despite their
brutal use over extended periods they have absolutely failed to hit any
significant numbers of the enemy and only succeed in killing children,
kittens and Red Cross ambulances. Against incompetents like America, the
Keystone Cops would have succeeded long ago."


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:454479d8{at}w3.nls.net...
> There is another possible explanation, assuming for sake of argument that
> these reports of isotopes and their measurement are anywhere near
> accurate. That explanation could be that Hezbollah had radioactive
> material supplied by Iran or Syria or both that they were housing at those
> munitions locations for use in dirty bomb attacks upon Israel.
>
> Any rational person would have to agree that if there was uranium found it
> was there because it was Hezbollah's uranium supplied by Iran and/or
> Syria. Could be a good reason such locations were bombed and  why they
> were defended by Hezbollah so fiercely during the battles.
>
> But those with bigoted views and a biased mind would never think of this
> possibility.
>
> Gary
>
> "Phil Payne" 
wrote in message
> news:454475b7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:45441f88{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Oh, I have no doubt, not one in a million years, that it's nothing more
>> than
>>> DU, but that those dweebs are playing it up like it's some nefarious
>> nuclear
>>> test is dangerous stuff indeed -- but what do they care?
>>
>> This the same "no doubt" you had about biological,
chemical and nuclear
>> weapons in Iraq?  The same "no doubt" that you had about
rape rooms and
>> hundreds of kilometres of tunnels under Baghdad?
>>
>>
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=58
55&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>>
>> "The soil sample from Khiam - site of a notorious torture prison when
>> Israel
>> occupied southern Lebanon between 1978 and 2000, and a frontline
>> Hizbollah
>> stronghold in the summer war - was a piece of impacted red earth from an
>> explosion; the isotope ratio was 108, indicative of the presence of
>> enriched
>> uranium."
>>
>> Personally, I find just about any source more credible than you, and an
>> isotope ratio comes quite close to the front.
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5