From: "Gary Britt" 

There is another possible explanation, assuming for sake of argument that
these reports of isotopes and their measurement are anywhere near accurate.
That explanation could be that Hezbollah had radioactive material supplied
by Iran or Syria or both that they were housing at those munitions
locations for use in dirty bomb attacks upon Israel.

Any rational person would have to agree that if there was uranium found it
was there because it was Hezbollah's uranium supplied by Iran and/or Syria.
Could be a good reason such locations were bombed and  why they were
defended by Hezbollah so fiercely during the battles.

But those with bigoted views and a biased mind would never think of this possibility.

Gary

"Phil Payne"  wrote in
message news:454475b7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:45441f88{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Oh, I have no doubt, not one in a million years, that it's nothing more
> than
>> DU, but that those dweebs are playing it up like it's some nefarious
> nuclear
>> test is dangerous stuff indeed -- but what do they care?
>
> This the same "no doubt" you had about biological, chemical
and nuclear
> weapons in Iraq?  The same "no doubt" that you had about
rape rooms and
> hundreds of kilometres of tunnels under Baghdad?
>
>
http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=585
5&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>
> "The soil sample from Khiam - site of a notorious torture prison when
> Israel
> occupied southern Lebanon between 1978 and 2000, and a frontline Hizbollah
> stronghold in the summer war - was a piece of impacted red earth from an
> explosion; the isotope ratio was 108, indicative of the presence of
> enriched
> uranium."
>
> Personally, I find just about any source more credible than you, and an
> isotope ratio comes quite close to the front.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5