Hello Ian!

Tuesday January 14 1997 03:23, Ian Smith wrote to Hamish Moffatt:

 >> > If I add S95=47, that should allow my new 33.6K modem to report the
 >> > modem to modem, not the modem to computer speed, shouldn't it?
 >> (AFAIK) you need W2 set as well.

 > S95 overrides W, at least if set later.  I've always found the Rockwell
 > docs a bit confusing about which S-register settings overrides what else,
 > so I'm not entirely sure whether a subsequent W setting will change S95 too
 > ..

Hmmm. I always thought you needed to set both. I always set both on my Supra,
whichever order, and it seems to work fine. Actually, S95=111 (on the
Supra, at least) will report both speeds in the CARRIER response on a
split-rate V.34 connection (even if the connection isn't actually
split-rate, but merely allows it.)

 > Thanks for the info on the Supra.  These have always seemed one of the more
 > 'highend' implementations over some of the more basic Rockwell-chip modems.

Yes, although as I mentioned previously one of mine has met with an early
demise due to my tinkering. I just might go out and buy one of those new
Spirits Dave Hatch talks about, $199 at Hardly Normal sounds ok. Should be
$140 anywhere else. :-)


Regards,
Hamish

--- GoldED/P32 2.42.G1219+