>
>Richard Meic wrote to Mark Bloss about "Existence Exists"
 
 MB>  Therefore, the Universe is infinite because an infinity exists within
 MB> its
 MB>  scope.
 RM> 
 RM> And THAT, my dear friend, is what I have been saying long ago when I 
 RM> first brought up the thread the first time more then a year ago.  That
 RM> the BB model is illogical.  If the universe is finite then there
 RM> should  *:NO:* infinities at all within the universe; no mathematical
 RM> infinities,  no quantum mechanical infinities, no infinitely divisible
 RM> properties of matter, and no infinitely circular religious arguments ;)
 RM> (MAN, I'd  love to live in a universe like that ).
 For infinity to be an attribute of a _finite_ universe is logically
 impossible.  _ANY_ infinity.  That is why God is not a subset of the
 Universe, rather the Universe is a subset of God.
 ;)
 
 But _that_ is entirely beside the point, I assure you.  A universe
 _without_ infinities would be totally foreign to us; so much so we 
 would not recognize _anything_ existent in it - in fact - we wouldn't
 likely be able to consciously exist ourselves within the boundries of
 such a thing - should it have any - that is... 
 
 
... For the majority, democracy is the tyranny of choice.
--- GEcho 1.11++TAG 2.7c
---------------