From: dmhills{at}attglobal.net (Don Hills)

In article , "Geo."
 wrote:
>"Adam Flinton"  wrote in message
>news:409d6f73$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Is he supposed to sodomise people with handy implements?
>
>No, but if he poured a chemical light on someone it would not be considered
>chemical warfare.

What was a lightstick doing there in the first place?

My point is, it was likely there for the claimed purpose - scaring the
bejesus out of the person being interrogated.

--
Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5