| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: parasites and non-par |
"John Wilkins" wrote in message
news:c4ak8j$1491$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org...
> Anthony Cerrato wrote:
>
> > (BTW, are males and females technically
> > considered to be sub-species?)
>
> Finally, something I can speak of with some authority...
>
> Yes. Technically, any class that can be further dividied
is a genus, and
> that into which it can be divided according to its
predicates is a
> species. Since under the Aristotlelian logic, a species is
a genus if it
> has subaltern species, these subaltern species must be
subspecies.
Excellent explanation. But what is a class...
> Of course, everybody made exceptions for living beings...
>
> "... if anyone utters such a proposition as ... "Argus was
a mastiff,"
> to what head of Predicables would such a Predicate be
referred? Surely
> our logical principles would lead us to answer, that it is
the
> _Species_; since it could hardly be called an Accident,
and is
> manifestly no other Predicable. And yet every Naturalist
would at once
> pronounce that Mastiff, is no distinct Species, but is
only a _variety_
> of the Species Dog. ...
> ... the solution of the difficulty is to be found in the
peculiar
> technical sense ... of the word "Species" when applied to
_organized
> Beings_: in which case it is always applied (when we are
speaking
> strictly, as naturalists) to individuals as are supposed
to be
> _descended from a common stock_, or which _might_ have so
descended;
> _viz._ which resemble one another (to use M. Cuvier's
expression) as
> much as those of the same stock do."
>
> Richard Whatley, Archbishop of Dublin, _Elements of Logic_
Ninth
> (octavo) ed. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Original
edition, 1826, p186.
>
> I am sure this will clarify the matter no end.
>
> [moderator's note: I stand (really -- okay, now I'm
sitting.) in
> awe. - JAH]
Me too! Quite impressive...and by an Archbishop too. I get
the gist of it tho, although I can see where there might be
some grey areas. And when you get down to the pre-biotic
chemical precursor/ancestors of life (DNA, RNA, polymeric
enzymes, etc.) we get completely fuzzy as to the
subdivisions of life. ...tonyC
> --
> John Wilkins
> john_SPAM{at}wilkins.id.au http://www.wilkins.id.au
> "Men mark it when they hit, but do not mark it when they
miss"
> - Francis
Bacon
>
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 3/31/04 8:25:25 PM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.