Hi Bill.

15-Apr-04 10:23:03, Bill Birrell wrote to Darin McBride


 >>  JB> and possibly even better re-written to use a char* instead

 >>  JB>  for( s=target ; *s ; s++ ) {

 >> Yes, I like this even more ;-)

 BB>     Not much point in using a for(;;) loop at all then. Why not just:-

 BB>     char *s=target;
 BB>     while(*s++) {...};

 BB>     simpler, neater, more direct.

but not equivalent.

  char *s=target-1;
  while(*++s) {...};


-=>bye<=-
---