| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Dawkins on Kimura |
John Edser wrote: > r norman wrote:- > > >>>>>JE:- >>>>>Typically BOH replaces testable reality >>>>>with just his "expectations" of it. >>>>>In simple terms such an absurd event >>>>>is termed: propaganda. The master was Stalin. >>>>>He turned reality into his "expectations" and >>>>>millions perished. >>>> > >>>>BOH:- >>>>John, please read up on simple probability theory before you write >>>>another post ridiculing expectations. They have a precise mathematical >>>>definition, which you seem to be totally unaware of. >>>>As for testability, you might like to read up about a wonderful subject >>>>called "statistics". It's used to fit models to data, which is an >>>>esential component of testing hypotheses. One of the things you can do >>>>is to estimate expected values (e.g. of allele frequency changes). >>> > >>>>JE:- >>>>Once again BOH asks us to replace a testable >>>>reality with just his expectations of it. >>> > > >>> >> > >>>BOH:- >>>This is just a sematic game. >> > > >>>JE:- >>>No, it is your "game" of misrepresentation. >> > >>BOH:- >>No, your statement confuses two uses of the word "expectation". I was >>using the word in a technical sense, which I then tried to explain. >>Your senetence seemed to use the non-technical sense of the word, which >>is a different matter. Your sentence implies that in replacing the real >>world with something else, I am not making any allowance for the fact >>that the real world may be different. This is not the case, and the >>implication in your sentence comes purely from the different uses of a >>word. In that sense it is purely a matter of playing with semantics. > > > JE:- > If you are not just "replacing the real > world with something else" using the > "technical sense" of the > word "expectation", then what is > the "real world" representation of > fitness that you are estimating? > My phrasing wasn't so clear - I am "replacing the real world with something else", but that I can still make allowances for it being different. My point was that when "taking expectations", I'm not asking you to believe what I think will happen, instead I'm integrating a random variable over it's density function. Bob -- Bob O'Hara Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics P.O. Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 5) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki Finland Telephone: +358-9-191 23743 Mobile: +358 50 599 0540 Fax: +358-9-191 22 779 WWW: http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/ Journal of Negative Results - EEB: http://www.jnr-eeb.org --- þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com --- * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 3/27/04 6:13:20 AM* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.