JS> > KK>1)  We have Nuclear Energy.
JS> > So? We are still light yrs away from understanding nuclear forces
JS> > the
JS> > way we understand electromagnetic forces.
JS>Just the opposite can also be said.
We can manipulate EM radiation and change it to many other different
forms of it while noclear energy can only be changed to heat and so far
useless and harmful radiation. All chemistry is based on our knowledge
of electromagnetism. Plus all electronics and stuff. You can't say the
same about nuclear forces or gravity for that matter.
JS> > KK>2)  We are doing HGP Human Genome Project. We are beginning to know 

JS> > KK>    own DNA and we're now Cloning.
JS> > It's crude and there's nothing we should be proud of. I say let's
JS> > leave loning to mother nature.
JS>Oh? ...What cloning does mother nature do?
Lot's of it. Bacteria dividing, human cells dividing, etc.
JS> > KK>4)  We are beginning to use Nanotechnology. We have yet to produce 
n
JS> > KK>    assembler but we're trying.
JS> > Nanotechnology is still many decades away.
JS>Pessimist.
Then give me proof that nanotechnology is here. I would welcome that
idea imidiatelly.
JS> > KK>5)  We're using Neural Networks to solve some
our problems, but it's
JS> > KK>    only resident in a few of our
computers. We have to change our
JS> > KK>    computers, per se, to
reflect Neural Network philosophies. Enter
JS> > KK>    American
Computer Corp.
JS> > What the heck is a Neural Network?
JS>Synapses inter-connected throughout the brain, communicating with each 
the
But how is it present in computers? Japanese are working on it but are
not having too much success at this time.
 * SLMR 2.1a * Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
--- GEcho 1.00
---------------