Lisa Mcintosh On (19 Sep 96) was overheard to say to Sheila King
 LM> Yes, it is a federal law but just because the parents request testing
 LM> it isn't mandatory. If the teacher doesn't feel it necessary then a
 LM> panel must review the case.
 That is almost correct.  Anyone with a vested interest in the welfare
 of the child can make a referral to the child study team (called by
 different names in different states) if they think the child has some
 difficulty that is impacting on her/his ability to learn.  The
 teacher doesn't have to agree or disagree for it to go to child
 study.  Most referrals come from teachers.  However, when a teacher
 makes a referral parental permission is _required_ by IDEA prior to
 the school undertaking _any_ formal testing or evaluation.
 LM> (This prevents students from having to go through all these tests
 LM> just at the parent's whim.)
 I won't say it... I won't say it... I won't sa... I won't... I...
 LM> It is when the teacher suggests testing that the school is
 LM> responsible for the testing.
 See above..the school system is ALWAYS responsible for the testing.
 If/when the school system refuses to do so (and it happens a lot)
 parents are free, as always, to go elsewhere.  _If_ the outside
 testing/evaluation reveals a problem that impacts on educational
 needs then the school system is required to pick up the tab.  What
 usually happens is the schools will then do their own testing.  _If_
 the results are the same then the child receives necessary services.
 _If_ there are conflicting results it goes to arbitration; a LONG
 process that is not always resolved satisfactorily to all parties and
 often winds up in state/federal courts.
 Bob
... Pandora's Law: Never open a box you didn't close yourself
--- PPoint 2.02
---------------