> Wouldn't you rather write:

 > for (n = 0; n < sqrt(INT_MAX); n++)

 > Otherwise, you would start getting negative numbers
 > after a bit.

    Fair enough, but I would rather not evaluate sqrt(INT_MAX) each time
through the loop, so for the price of one more stacked identifier - const
int top:-

#include
#include
int main(void)
{   int n;
    const int top=(int)sqrt(INT_MAX);
    for(n = 0; n  * Origin: Escan BBS (2:25/200)

SEEN-BY: 633/267 270

@PATH: 25/200 108 252/110 250/501 140/1 106/2000 633/267