http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3CXnsA3E7BEDD5FC0DC9
X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791%40192.254.233.145%3E
or
https://tinyurl.com/q3lts7k

Path: eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dustin 
Newsgroups: alt.comp.anti-virus,alt.2600,alt.comp.freeware,alt.comp.virus
Subject: Re: He's Terminal on Pain Killers But He Can Outfight ANYONE -
According To PityBoi
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 23:43:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Diesel
Lines: 50
Message-ID: 
References: 




Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 23:43:06 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="82c950c44c1460224ed0debd4bb2fb7e";
 logging-data="9534";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/c
GQPLGU+CPWK5mcKRZwbR19D74uRsWvs="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pGcPl6MHfBDvZKvP+HvUErgVap0=

Anonymous  wrote in
news:cbf23a0f3d0f5fa77770b0d03ad2a79e@hoi-polloi.org:

>>Anyone who complains about me after this is an IDIOT! They
>>merely  want to something to complain about, or they are trying to
>>help their  psycho buddy Duck####Mouth.
>
>Sheeple, this is how you're viewed in the remailers eyes. My opinion
>of you isn't far from that one, either. So on this small point, we
>agree.

And where exactly did I call anyone "sheeple. I not only did not refer
to the average reader that way, I also did not accuse DuckTurd's
friends of being "sheeple". I accused them of corrupt dishonesty.

>I've mentioned numerous times and have had others quote my posts
>numerous times, expressing my distaste for the general non thinking
>for a damn second on their own, follow the ####ing herd, right off a
>cliff, AKA, the sheeple. I still think the term, 'lemmings' is a  better
>description though, but this is the sheeple I'm addressing so  I must
>dumb it down for you.

Now who is calling the readers of this group "sheeple"?

He also is accusing you of being lemmings.

Which one of us is name calling?

>They just confused my words to include everyone on the planet;
>those  people who are capable of independent thought processes
>and have  previously demonstrated such a skill are not the people I
>referenced  then or now. When I wrote that I didn't think much of
>most people, I  fully meant the sheeple; which is what most people
>are.. history,  hell, just look around you. It's easy enough to spot.

Oh, now he's modifying his words from past posts in which he had a
VERY low opinion of people. The problem with this is he has addressed
what he thinks of people in many of his posts, not just one.

Remember where he said you "deserved" the viruses he dropped on you?

Remember his "people are worthless" post?

Remember his "I attack you because you allow it".

Remember his "Pure hate of others" and "They deserve the #### I dump
on them"?

Remember his "My programming is a taste of the hate I feel" ?

>Those intelligent enough to realize that on their own are clearly not
>the people I was commenting about, then or now.

He realizes now how his posts have disclosed his hatred of everyone.

>Glad to have had a chance to clear that glaring misconception up; as
> I wasn't specific enough in the posts from so long ago, I guess.
>Sheeple, I still consider you to be equ to pondscum and I don't think
>much of you. Nothing has changed in that respect. I don't think any
>better of you than this remailing coward does. It's just willing to  use
>you for your stupidity (it knows if you can read, you aren't  going to
>take much effort to do so) and I'm retired now.

Anyone who reads his unexpurgated posts at the Howard Knight site or
the Google archives and believes those posts to be his is "pondscum".

I'm using you for your stupidity? I guess if you believe Howard Knight
and Google, you're stupid.

How lame can this psycho douche bag get?

>I added two additional newsgroups to this reply. I know it's trollish  of
>me, but I don't feel like having to rewrite this post or post it  again...in
>those newsgroups; easier to just let you know how it is  with this
>one. If your one of the people who believes the remailer is  writing
>nothing but the gospel concerning me, be proud and wear your
>lemming badge proudly as you happily walk off the edge and go splat.
>

So, once more, if you don't believe Google and Howard Knight are out
to malign and lible DuckTurd, you're stupid. If you believe all those
posts at those sites are accurate and true, you're pond scum.

>
>--
>I remember I posted a comment discussing how hackers will go as
>far  as to profile their targets. I guess he gave one of them reason to
> move him from the back-burner to the oven...
>thisguy1337torrentfreak.com

I have no idea what that last bit of maundering nonsense means.

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2