TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: barktopus
to: Rich Gauszka
from: Mark
date: 2006-10-31 01:03:14
subject: Re: Human liver grown from stem cells

From: "Mark" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C6FC88.5843ADA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I actually heard Rush's original broadcast. To say that what he said has =
been mischaracterized, is to make a great understatement; but in seeing =
what the rest of the media chooses to air, it's understandable that any =
casual observer would think Rush is an ogre too 

Paraphrasing Rush (and I find it amusing that I actually heard the =
broadcast, as I don't listen to him very often) and not necessarily in =
proper chronological order, he said, "Wow, I've seen Fox in Boston
Legal = and I like him and that show, but he seems perfectly normal in the
= episodes I've seen, so he must be either acting or off his medications =
in that commercial."=20

Then it turns out in Fox's own book, he relates that he went off his = meds
to testify in front of congress so they'd get an accurate picture = of the
devastating disease. So, I'm just not getting what Rush said that = was so
offensive 

  "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message =
news:4546e605$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Actually Rush Limbaugh is the one that went over the top with his =
statement that Fox was acting with his disease.. I was just lampooning =
Rush.  Limbaugh has every right to criticize the message but it really =
was low to make fun of Fox's predicament. And like the weasel ( I should =
apologize for offending weasels ) Rush is he avoided and debate with Fox =
when he was invited this weekend


    "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:4546e343$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Bob, Rich was the one that went over the top on this one: "Rush =
Limbaugh will now proclaim British Scientists evil and in league with =
Michael J Fox in their diabolical attempt to embarrass the Bushies over =
stem cell research."=20

    If scientists want to do embryonic stem cell research no one is =
stopping them, they're just going to have to find someone besides us to =
pay for it. Maybe Branson would be better advised to fund it instead of =
getting involved in the global warming nonsense to the tune of $3B?=20

    Actually, that's a bad example, as I believe Branson is wisely =
funding alternative fuels with his donation, rather than throwing money =
into the sky, like the alarmists want our governments to do, maybe Soros =
will fund it? Or Gates? Or Buffet?=20

    How about too, that expected 1,900 pounds a year increased tax =
proposal for every UK family to fund the politicians global warming =
playground? =20
      "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message =
news:4546e0f1{at}w3.nls.net...
      Except the articles quoted so far do seem to make the distinction. =
There does seem to be major differences in the usefulness of the =
different types of stem cells with the Embryonic being the most =
versatile.
        "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:4546decf$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        Aha Bob, you found me out,  I was distorting the record, thus =
falsely making Bush look good.=20

        Hmm, kind of like when adult stem cell or cord blood research =
successes are splashed around indiscriminately to confuse people and try =
to make Bush falsely look like an ogre.
          "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message =
news:4546dd06{at}w3.nls.net...
          Be sort of hard for many presidents before Bush to approve =
stem cell research. First stem cells were only isolated in late 98

          =
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/18/AR2006071=
800722.html

          I suspect the alternatives would never have been discovered if =
the original embryonic research had not occurred
            "Mark"  wrote in message =
news:4546d7de$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            Bush was the first president to fund stem cell research at =
all. I guess he shouldn't have? And Gary is right, this breakthrough (if =
it even is that ultimately) has nothing to do with destroying embryos, =
rather it's a potentially solid argument for alternatives instead.
              "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message =
news:4546d47c{at}w3.nls.net...
              Bush limited federal funds for stem cell research in 2001 =
to the limited number of stem cells created before that date. In effect =
Bush did curtail research on non-embryonic stem cells

                "Gary Britt"  wrote in =
message news:4546d0be{at}w3.nls.net...

                Yep, it was Chord Blood stem cells NOT embryonic stem =
cells.

                From your link.   The tissue was created from blood =
taken from babies' umbilical cords just a few minutes after birth.

                There is no federal funding ban on NON-Embryonic stem =
cell research, but don't let the facts get in the way or your politics.  =
Michael J. Fox, nor any of the MSM do.



                Gary Britt wrote:=20

                  Did they use EMBRYONIC stem cells?  Bush is the first =
president to approve ANY federal funding for embryonic stem cells.  He =
approved for existing cell lines.  There is no law against embyonic stem =
cell research.  If it was promising it would be funded privately.=20

                  So far all that embryonic stem cell research has =
produced are brain tumors and absolutely no, zero, nada cures of = anything.=20

                  There have been successes with chord blood stem cells =
and adult stem cells.  Neither of which are banned from federal funding. =


                  The lefties like to quote stories about successful =
treatments from Chord blood and adult stem cell research, and then try = to
confuse readers/listeners as though that says something about = embryonic
stem cells research.=20

                  Embryonic stem cell research is not banned, just not =
federally funded. This debate is about people who want money from the =
government and not about finding cures.=20

                  Gary=20



                  Rich Gauszka wrote:=20

                    Rush Limbaugh will now proclaim British Scientists =
evil and in league with Michael J Fox in their diabolical attempt to =
embarrass the Bushies over stem cell research.=20

                    =
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_=
id=3D413551&in_page_id=3D1770&ico=3DHomepage&icl=3DTabModule&icc=3DNEWS&c=
t=3D5=20
                    British scientists have grown the world's first =
artificial liver from stem cells in a breakthrough that will one day =
provide entire organs for transplant.=20

                    The technique that created the 'mini-liver', =
currently the size of a one pence piece, will be developed to create a =
full-size functioning liver.=20

                    Described as a 'Eureka moment' by the Newcastle =
University researchers, the tissue was created from blood taken from =
babies' umbilical cords just a few minutes after birth.=20

                    As it stands, the mini organ can be used to test new =
drugs, preventing disasters such as the recent 'Elephant Man' drug = trial.
Using lab-grown liver tissue would also reduce the number of = animal
experiments.=20

                    Within five years, pieces of artificial tissue could =
be used to repair livers damaged by injury, disease, alcohol abuse and =
paracetamol overdose=20





------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C6FC88.5843ADA0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








I actually heard Rush's original =
broadcast. To say=20
that what he said has been mischaracterized, is to make a great = understatement;=20
but in seeing what the rest of the media chooses to air, it's = understandable=20
that any casual observer would think Rush is an ogre too =
<g>
 
Paraphrasing Rush (and I find it =
amusing that I=20
actually heard the broadcast, as I don't listen to him very often) and = not=20
necessarily in proper chronological order, he said, "Wow, I've seen Fox = in=20
Boston Legal and I like him and that show, but he seems perfectly normal = in the=20
episodes I've seen, so he must be either acting or off his medications = in that=20
commercial." 
 
Then it turns out in Fox's own
book, he =
relates=20
that he went off his meds to testify in front of congress so they'd get = an=20
accurate picture of the devastating disease. So, I'm just not getting = what Rush=20
said that was so offensive <unrelated, but I don't get was so =
offensive about=20
the blonde chick telling Harold Ford to call her =
either>
 
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com> wrote = in message=20 news:4546e605$1{at}w3.nls.net... Actually Rush Limbaugh is the one = that went over=20 the top with his statement that Fox was acting with his disease.. I = was just=20 lampooning Rush. Limbaugh has every right to criticize the = message but=20 it really was low to make fun of Fox's predicament. And like the = weasel ( I=20 should apologize for offending weasels ) Rush is he avoided and debate = with=20 Fox when he was invited this weekend
"Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com> wrote = in message=20 news:4546e343$1{at}w3.nls.net... Bob, Rich was the one that went = over the top on=20 this one: "Rush Limbaugh = will now=20 proclaim British Scientists evil and in league with Michael J Fox in = their=20 diabolical attempt to embarrass the Bushies over stem cell = research."=20 If scientists want to do embryonic = stem cell=20 research no one is stopping them, they're just going to have to find = someone=20 besides us to pay for it. Maybe Branson would be better advised to = fund it=20 instead of getting involved in the global warming nonsense to the = tune of=20 $3B? Actually, that's a bad example, as = I believe=20 Branson is wisely funding alternative fuels with his donation, = rather than=20 throwing money into the sky, like the alarmists want our governments = to do,=20 maybe Soros will fund it? Or Gates? Or Buffet? How about too, that expected 1,900 = pounds a=20 year increased tax proposal for every UK family to fund the = politicians=20 global warming playground? <wow, maybe now the regular folk = that=20 aren't paying attention will wake up, smell the coffee (or tea = as the=20 UK case may be) and tell them to get over themselves -- when they = start=20 picking the pockets of the public directly with their alarmism, it's = near=20 the end game>
"Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net> = wrote in=20 message news:4546e0f1{at}w3.nls.net... Except the articles quoted so far do seem to = make the=20 distinction. There does seem to be major differences in the = usefulness of=20 the different types of stem cells with the Embryonic being the = most=20 versatile.
"Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com> = wrote in=20 message news:4546decf$1{at}w3.nls.net... Aha Bob, you found me out, = <g> I=20 was distorting the record, thus falsely making Bush look good.=20 Hmm, kind of like when adult = stem cell or=20 cord blood research successes are splashed around = indiscriminately=20 to confuse people and try to make Bush falsely look like an = ogre.
"Robert G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>=20">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>=20 wrote in message news:4546dd06{at}w3.nls.net... Be sort of hard for many presidents before = Bush to=20 approve stem cell research. First stem cells were only = isolated in=20 late 98 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/18/A= R2006071800722.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article= /2006/07/18/AR2006071800722.html I suspect the alternatives would never = have been=20 discovered if the original embryonic research had not=20 occurred
"Mark" <nomail{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:nomail{at}hotmail.com">nomail{at}hotmail.com> wrote in=20 message news:4546d7de$1{at}w3.nls.net... Bush was the first = president to fund=20 stem cell research at all. I guess he shouldn't have? And = Gary is=20 right, this breakthrough (if it even is that ultimately) has = nothing=20 to do with destroying embryos, rather it's a potentially = solid=20 argument for alternatives instead.
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>=20">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com>=20 wrote in message news:4546d47c{at}w3.nls.net... Bush limited federal = funds for stem=20 cell research in 2001 to the=20 limited number of stem cells created before that date. In = effect=20 Bush did curtail research on non-embryonic stem=20 cells "Gary Britt" <glbNOSPAM{at}gencogDOTcom.com=">mailto:glbNOSPAM{at}gencogDOTcom.com">glbNOSPAM{at}gencogDOTcom.com= >=20 wrote in message news:4546d0be{at}w3.nls.net...Yep,=20 it was Chord Blood stem cells NOT embryonic stem=20 cells.From your link. The tissue = was=20 created from blood taken from babies' umbilical cords = just a few=20 minutes after birth.There is no federal = funding ban=20 on NON-Embryonic stem cell research, but don't let the = facts get=20 in the way or your politics. Michael J. Fox, nor = any of=20 the MSM do.Gary Britt wrote:=20
Did=20 they use EMBRYONIC stem cells? Bush is the first = president to approve ANY federal funding for embryonic = stem=20 cells. He approved for existing cell = lines. There=20 is no law against embyonic stem cell research. = If it was=20 promising it would be funded privately. So far = all=20 that embryonic stem cell research has produced are = brain=20 tumors and absolutely no, zero, nada cures of = anything.=20 There have been successes with chord blood = stem cells=20 and adult stem cells. Neither of which are = banned from=20 federal funding. The lefties like to quote = stories=20 about successful treatments from Chord blood and adult = stem=20 cell research, and then try to confuse = readers/listeners as=20 though that says something about embryonic stem cells=20 research. Embryonic stem cell research is not = banned,=20 just not federally funded. This debate is about people = who=20 want money from the government and not about finding = cures.=20 Gary Rich Gauszka wrote: Rush Limbaugh will now = proclaim=20 British Scientists evil and in league with Michael J = Fox in=20 their diabolical attempt to embarrass the Bushies = over stem=20 cell research. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_= article_id=3D413551&in_page_id=3D1770&ico=3DHomepage&icl=3DTa= bModule&icc=3DNEWS&ct=3D5">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/= articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=3D413551&in_page_id=3D1770&= ico=3DHomepage&icl=3DTabModule&icc=3DNEWS&ct=3D5=20 British scientists have grown the world's first=20 artificial liver from stem cells in a breakthrough = that will=20 one day provide entire organs for transplant. = The=20 technique that created the 'mini-liver', currently = the size=20 of a one pence piece, will be developed to create a=20 full-size functioning liver. Described as a = 'Eureka=20 moment' by the Newcastle University researchers, the = tissue=20 was created from blood taken from babies' umbilical = cords=20 just a few minutes after birth. As it = stands, the=20 mini organ can be used to test new drugs, preventing = disasters such as the recent 'Elephant Man' drug = trial.=20 Using lab-grown liver tissue would also reduce the = number of=20 animal experiments. Within five years, = pieces of=20 artificial tissue could be used to repair livers = damaged by=20 injury, disease, alcohol abuse and paracetamol = overdose=20 = = ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01C6FC88.5843ADA0-- --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.